buynorthface

January 28, 2011. Canadian disability organizations, such as the Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CRIB) and the Alliance for Equality of Blind Canadians (ABE), cheap north face have come out with strong statements against the recent Canadian government’s appeal of a court ruling that federal government websites are to be made accessible to sensory impaired users cheap north face by 2012. CRIB, in its Press Release, describes the government’s appeal as “unbelievable” and “ridiculous” and a waste of taxpayer money.  Abe’s Press Release echoed these sentiments, saying, “we are outraged by the government’s decision to appeal this landmark decision”.

Both groups have suggested that the money and effort that the government will need to invest in this appeal could be better spent on simply getting on with the job of making government information accessible to people with a sensory impairments.

Previously, in November 2010, a Toronto, Ontario court found government websites were not compliant with Canadian website standards adopted in 2001, and that this constituted a breach of equality rights. This constitutional challenge was brought by a buy north face Toronto woman in 2007, and who is blind, who sued after discovering she could not apply for a federal job online, nor complete the census forms online nor access state pension information. The court found for her under the Canadian Charter for Rights and Freedoms and gave the government fifteen months to make its websites compliant, under supervision by the court.

In response to the court’s November 2010 order, the Canadian Treasury Board Secretariat said they would file an appeal of the ruling to address “.. some fundamental issues raised by the decision …These include cheap north face factual findings made by the Court, numerous aspects of the legal reasoning applied to north face outlets those facts, and the unusual supervisory order of the court to monitor implementation of its decision.”  In the case, the Canadian federal government argued that its services are available in the alternative by way of telephone, in person and by mail, and disputed the discrimination charges.

Apparently, according to reports, the officials making the Canadian government’s case forgot that a Treasury audit conducted on 47 of the 146 federal departments in north face cheap 2007 found non-compliance with accessibility standards. Listen to webinar by Donna Johan, who brought the case forward. Read Canadian news story on the 2010 ruling. Cheap North Face thanks Media Access Australia, an International Friend, for providing news and updates on this evolving story.